White male co-workers made frequent comments about Deanna Evans's hair, remarking that she looked “unprofessional” and “inappropriate.”
Evans, an African American who wore her hair in a natural state, was a technical quality leader at International Paper Company’s Eastover, SC, plant. She complained to IPC but the company took no corrective action. So Evans quit, got another job, and filed a race and sex discrimination lawsuit against IPC alleging that she was the victim of a hostile workplace environment.
A three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, based in Richmond, VA, recently ruled that the unseemly focus on Evans' hair, while “frustrating and unpleasant,” did not justify her voluntary resignation from IPC.
The panel said Evan's did not experience a level of hostility that would compel a "reasonable person in her position ... to resign."
The panel was all-white and consisted of two males and one female. However, the panel upheld the lower court decision by U.S. District Judge Julianna Michelle Childs, who is African American. Evans rejected a recommendation by a magistrate judge to deny IPC's request to dismiss Evans’ claims for constructive discharge based on a hostile work environment.
According to court documents:
Today In: Leadership
Evans, who holds a chemical engineering degree and a masters in business administration, said she was generally treated worse than white male co-workers at IPC. She said she was ignored and left of out meetings. She complained to her supervisor and the plant manager in 2014 and early 2015 but they took no corrective action. She quit in March 2015, citing the “current working environment.”
Grads of Life BRANDVOICE
In an odd twist, Evans appears to have been penalized because she was well regarded by IPC management, which sought to keep her on the payroll and held a “farewell lunch” to commemorate her departure. Moreover, Evans was exceedingly polite in her exit correspondence with company officials, thanking them for listening to her concerns.
According to the appeal court:
“The conditions, while no doubt frustrating and unpleasant to Evans, cannot, from an objective perspective, be construed to leave her no choice but to resign. In fact, Evans says as much in her resignation letter. There, she said her time at IPC, despite challenges, had been ‘on the whole, satisfying and productive.’”
You've Been Timed Out
Please login to continue