Your browser is not supported. please upgrade to the latest version of Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari or Microsoft Edge.

‘Give women a fair chance to lead’ urge psychology experts

By Adam McCulloch


The low number of women in senior positions in organisations could be down to a lack of understanding of leadership styles, psychological assessments have shown. 

Those women who succeed in gaining promotion to the top jobs usually exhibit decision-making styles mirroring those of men, the data reveals.

New research by business psychology specialist The Myers-Briggs Company has found that more than two-thirds (70%) of women in leadership roles use the so-called “thinking” preference to make decisions at work, a preference that is more often associated with men.

The shortfall of women in top roles is highlighted as a main reason for the stubborn gender pay gap.

Women, according to data gleaned by Myers-Briggs from its personality type tests, are more likely to be associated with the “feeling” preference, which the research authors characterise as a value-driven and more rounded approach to decision-making. The thinking preference, by contrast, deploys objectivity, logic and impersonal criteria to make decisions.

However for women who reach more senior positions, the thinking preference dominates. While women are over-represented among lower quartiles of employee levels, more than half (55%) had a thinking preference, the research found.

This would indicate that when women reach higher levels of organisations, a values-driven perspective is lacking in leadership. Roughly equal proportions of men at all occupation levels use thinking and feeling preferences.

Read More

Load older comments...

Loading comments...

Add comment


April 2019

LGBT groups and tech companies warn that a Texas bill could cost the state billions


March 2019

Prince Harry Is Taking Paternity Leave. That's Great for Meghan Markle But Also for Women...


July 2019

Paid Leave Soon to be Required in Nevada


September 2019

HRC Hasn’t Always Defended LGBTQ People of Color — We’re Changing That


November 2019

These Four Statistics Will Change the Way You Approach Diversity and Inclusion

You've Been Timed Out

Please login to continue