Friendly advice to law firms announcing new partners: Don’t put up photos of your latest elevations unless there’s a modicum of diversity among those happy faces.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind Wharton & Garrison learned that lesson the hard way earlier this year. After publishing photos of its fresh batch of partners—11 men and one woman (all white)—the firm got slammed for its super-Caucasian, male class.
Kirkland & Ellis is falling into the same trap. As you probably know, Kirkland made a jaw-dropping number of partners this year—141 to be exact. But here’s the flip side: Only three black lawyers appeared among that sea of faces. (I’m basing this on appearance, as Kirkland has not responded to my request for comment.) As for women and Asians, the firm is doing better: I counted 46 women and about a dozen or so Asians, though that included those in its Asia offices.
But let’s get back to the issue of black partners, because that’s where many firms have trouble. While making very few or even zero black partners in a given year might be explainable when the partnership class is quite small (arguably, the situation with Paul Weiss), it’s troubling when the class is large.
As I’ve reported, blacks seem to be lagging behind in the partnership race this year. And that’s particularly notable at firms with relatively big partnership classes, such as White & Case (41 new partners) and Jones Day (46 new partners), where there were no new black partners at all.
That said, no firm compares with Kirkland for the scale of its partnership class. So, yes, I find it shocking that only three blacks made the cut out of a pool of 141 new partners in a firm with 2,300 lawyers.
What that means is that black lawyers aren’t even making it to starting gate, even though the gate is wide. Under Kirkland’s system, junior partners only get the privilege of auditioning for equity status. As my colleague Patrick Smith notes in his recent article about Kirkland’s new partners, historically, only about 20% of its income partners eventually became equity partners after a four-year tryout period.
Which raises these questions: How daunting are the odds for black lawyers to attain equity? And how many black partners at Kirkland have equity at all?
We don’t know the answer and Kirkland isn’t saying. (Law.com’s Dylan Jackson reports that other Am Law 100 firms—King & Spalding; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner; and Sidley Austin—also refuse to break down equity versus nonequity partners in their survey responses.)
But keep this in mind: Minorities struggle mightily to get out of the income partner ranks. According to Jackson, “minority lawyers disproportionately occupy the nonequity partnership tier of the nation’s largest-grossing law firms compared to their white colleagues.”
Is Kirkland at the bottom of the diversity ranking? Actually, not. It ranked 45th on ALM’s diversity scorecard this year, up from 57 in 2018. Black lawyers comprised 1.6% of all partners and 2.8% of all lawyers, while Asian Americans made up 7.4% partners and 10.6% of all lawyers. For Hispanics, the breakdown was 3.2% partners and 4.4% lawyers.
You've Been Timed Out
Please login to continue