Your browser is not supported. please upgrade to the latest version of Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari or Microsoft Edge.

Using the wrong language to describe identity does more harm than you think

Brianna Holt


Last week, Melania Trump tweeted a photo that ignited controversy. In it, she and President Trump smiled next to an infant survivor of the mass shooting in El Paso, one in which the shooter targeted hispanic victims. Some critics thought the Trumps’ wide smiles were inappropriate in the wake of such a tragic event. The photo reminded many of another tweeted photo from 2016, in which a smiling Trump prepares to chow down on a taco salad, accompanied with the caption “I love Hispanics.”

In 2019, the phrase “I love Hispanics” is cringe-worthy (not that it was all that great three years ago). The same goes for one-word terms for other minority groups, like the “blacks,” the “African-Americans,” and “these people.”

That’s because the language we deem acceptable about minority groups has changed dramatically, even over the course of just a few years.

Stephen Russell, a sociology professor at The University of Texas at Austin who focuses on LGBTQ youth, says using appropriate language to refer to marginalized groups comes down to grammar. The person is a noun, and a portion of their experience should be an adjective. That experience or identity shouldn’t define them. “There’s a big risk in having a label represent the entire person because of the history of exclusion, and that’s why we don’t name everyone else in the dominant categories,” Russell tells Quartz. “We need to acknowledge their personhood rather than just their transgenderhood or their race.” Not doing so, Russell says, reduces a whole group of people to a single characteristic—”and that characteristic is an aspect of oppression. The language rhetorically reduces people to one dimension of their experience.”

 “The language rhetorically reduces people to one dimension of their experience.” That kind of “reductive” language is less common to hear now in public forums, but it’s noticeable when it does come up. Over the years, Trump has called black people “the blacks” and Hispanic people “the Hispanics”; when speaking of white people, Trump usually just says “the American people.” In effect, this rhetoric separates people of color from the majority, highlighting that any problems they encounter are unique to them.

Thankfully, this kind of language is less acceptable than ever. In an interview with Vogue last year, Ed Razek, then the CMO of Victoria’s Secret, used the word “transsexual” to describe the kind of model he would never hire, though he later walked back his comments. The term might have been unremarkable to use as recently as eight years ago, but in 2018 it spurred backlash on the internet.

Read More 

    Gender Equity/Diversity
    Racial Equity/Diversity

Load older comments...

Loading comments...

Add comment


July 2019

LA is largest city to formally include LGBTQ businesses in contracting process worth billi...


April 2020

What’s The Difference Between Being Laid Off And Being Furloughed?


January 2020

How to Center Inclusion to The Hiring Process


May 2020

Adapt Your D&I Efforts to the Reality of the Crisis


March 2019

Want a healthcare system better suited for women? Let more of them hold the purse strings....

You've Been Timed Out

Please login to continue